



Combining best performing forex pair should hugely increase your expected return and Sharpe Ratio
The first little bit talks about the combination. I have tested this on multiple time frames but usually find these 2 best performing currency pairs historically will give you highest expected rate of return and expected Sharpe as well.
Note that there is a gap of blackness in video so just wait to see the detailed analysis.
Do realize that this technique can be applied to any asset class universally.
If you are interested in how the Portfolio Optimization, I have various videos that showcase this
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!
When to use Sortino over Sharpe ratio
You need to love Investopedia when you learn something new everyday
. Sharpe ratios are better at analyzing portfolios that have low volatility because the Sortino ratio won’t have enough data points to calculate downside deviation. This makes the Sortino ratio better when analyzing highly volatile portfolios.
Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sortinoratio.asp#ixzz3Yv5bFZYK
Join my FREE newsletter to learn more about the right way to back test your trading ideas
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!PDF Red Rock research paper: Is there such thing better than a Sharpe Ratio for measuring your trading activity?
This was just sent in by the NYC contact.
http://www.redrockcapital.com/assets/RedRock_Sortino_white_paper.pdf
See how we use thie benchmark by joining my FREE newsletter
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!How to use performance metric like Sharpe Ratio to reduce your drawdown in your trading?
Again, thank to my NYC source for providing this
http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~abrock/algotrading/page9.html
Find out how we plan to do this through our FREE newsletter
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!Here is my opinion of CAPM and Sharpe Ratio while you research your potential profitable quant trading strategy
My response:
I am no expert but I do believe CAPM is really decent for finding beta. That is about it.
Sharpe ratio is an industry standard to find the performance on your trading strategies.
More info on the function from Matlab from:
http://www.mathworks.com/discovery/capm.html
http://www.mathworks.com/help/finance/sharpe.html
Learn more of stuff like this through my FREE newsletter
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!
Volatility weighting and volatility targeting improves Sharpe Ratio
There is increasing interest in riskcontrolled investment strategies, such as volatility weighting and volatility targeting. However, surprisingly little has been done from a theoretical perspective in studying the relative dominance or optimality of volatility weighted strategies. I recently wrote a paper ( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2008176 ) in which I provide a proof that volatility weighting over time increases the Sharpe or Information Ratio. The higher the degree of volatility smoothing achieved by volatility weighting, the higher the riskadjusted performance. Our results apply to risky portfolios managed against a risk free or risky benchmark (so including alpha strategies) and to volatility targeting strategies. We provide an empirical illustration of our results. I welcome any comments or remarks on my paper or on this topic !
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2008176
papers.ssrn.com
==
Very interesting formalization of “market timing”. Two comments:
– The normalized return r=R/sig (i.e. the return divided by its standard deviation) can be nonunique because of capacity issues: as we take more and more risk “sig” in a given strategy with return “R”, the distribution of the return R varies in scale, but also in other features. This is a second order effect that kicks in only when the strategy/portfolio that generates R becomes large.
– In practice people look at the sample Sharpe ratio s_SR, defined over a period 1>T as the ratio of the sample mean divided by the sample standard deviation:
s_SR(1>T)=s_mean{R_t}/s_Sd{R_t}
Before the realization of the series of returns R_t from t=1 to t=T, s_SR is a random variable, whose features, such as expectation E{s_SR}, standard deviation Sd{s_SR}, etc., might be related in a nontrivial way to E{R_t}/Sd{R_t}, which is the subject of the above paper.
=–
Ad 1. Indeed, I can imagine that the distribution of the voltargeted return r*_t = [ R_t / sig_t ] * V is different for different values of the voltarget V. The reason I see is that the full excess return is scaled, not only its deviation from its mean. So I guess that in addition to the variance component (which we want to target) there is a bias component which affects the distribution of the rescaled returns r*_t.
Another issue is that I limit myself to volatility as the risk measure. Volscaling will undoubtedly also affect downside risk and tail risk. That signifies a nice route for further research.
Ad 2. The population Sharpe Ratio is defined as the risk premium per unit volatility, which implies that numerator and denominator are estimated separately. But indeed the sample SR is a composite stochastic variable (i.e. the ratio of two variates). When evaluating a sample SR, the estimate can be subjected to a statictical test. (A good reference is “Performance Hypothesis Testing with the Sharpe Ratio” by Christoph Memmel in Finance Letters, 2003.)
I hope I have addressed your issues satisfactorily.
—
Last week I updated my volatility weighting paper (SSRN nr 2008176), addressing a.o. the issue above.
In April I also looked at the FamaFrench momentum factor (data from French’s website) and found a doubling of the Sharpe Ratio after simple vol weighting. This is fully in line with the results on volweighting the momentum factor that are reported by Barrosso & SantaClara (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2041429). Over subperiods, I even found that vol weighting did turn negative Sharpe Ratios into positive ones !
It is wellknown that momentum returns are negatively related to volatility. That vol weighting works so well for momentum may hence not come as a surprise. The timing effect (increasing positions when vol is low and returns tend to be positive, and vice versa) is substantial.
—
One question on Barrosso & SantaClara (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2041429)
The authors standardize the strategy by its recent unconditional sample standard deviation, i.e. calling w_t the weights that determine the strategy at time t and r_t the respective returns, they use the sample s.dev. of the recent series w_t’*r_t.
An alternative would be to use the conditional s.dev., or pointintime s.dev, i.e. the sample s.dev. of w_T’*r_t, where the current weights w_T are hit by the past returns r_t.
Any reason pro/against either approach?
==
Just a small comment regarding the Memmel (2003) test for the Sharpe ratio that was mentioned earlier. The Memmel test is not robust against nonnormality and/or GARCH effects. We know both of these are important in financial timeseries. This is why it would be generally preferable to use the test I published with Mike Wolf:
Ledoit, O., and Wolf, M. (2008).
Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio. (PDF, 302 KB)
Journal of Empirical Finance, 15, 850859.
==
Addressing Attilio’s comment above : in their empirical analysis of volatilityweighting the FamaFrench momentum factor (UMD), Barroso & SantaClara indeed use the past momentum series itself to gauge the volatility. An alternative would be, as Attilio describes, to take the historical pointintime volatility of the *current* UMD portfolio.
In favor of the B&SC approach is that they measure the risk of momentum.
After all, generally speaking, when you would use the return history of the current momentum stocks (or portfolio), then this would not represent momentum risk since the current momentum stocks were not momentum stocks in the past. But since B&SC look back only 6 months, I doubt whether this would make a difference.
So I guess that when evaluating the use of the realized or the pointintime volatility it is important to see whether the attribute you want to consider does change over the risk estimation interval or not. If it does change, I would use the realized returns on that attribute; if it does not, there’s not much difference. Would you agree ?
One complicating factor is that in a strategy you can have neutral positions and these neutral positions would lower the realized vol. At some point I would start feeling uncomfortable in using the actual series to estimate vol …..
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!
Learn Maximum number of intraday Sharpe ratio
Get more details here to get access to the course and other huge benefits including High Frequency Trading platform building, QuantLibXL analysis, Matlab, etc.
http://quantlabs.net/quantmemberbenefits/slashyourquantlearningcurve/
Thanks for reading Bryan
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!
http://quantlabs.net/quantmemberbenefits/slashyourquantlearningcurve/
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!
Videos on algo strategy development course with Sharpe Ratio, Periodic rate of return, benchmarking, and Profits from limit orders
Dear Fellow Quant:
A lot of traders have been getting very excited about my new High Frequency Trading (HFT) Algorithm/Strategy Development Course.
That’s because no one else is doing detailed quant analysis reviews and videos quite like Quantlabs.net. Do you know how to use any of the following in your trading right now?
– Sharpe ratio
– Periodic or simple rate of return
– Performance attribution (also known as benchmarking)
– Profitability in limit orders
I added these 4 topics just the other day. And over the coming days and weeks, advanced videos will include forecasting, arbitrage strategies, and many more.
Why not start learning how the world’s most profitable quant traders do it?
[Click here to add an extra dimension to your trading sophistication]
http://quantlabs.net/quantmemberbenefits/slashyourquantlearningcurve/
Bryan Downing
Founder and Editor
Quantlabs.net
P.S. In the hypercompetitive trading world, you don’t want to be left in yesterday’s dust. Especially when you can lock in today’s ultra affordable membership rate permanently by joining right now.
Remember, I can’t keep the current membership rate this low much longer.
[Click here to find out more]
http://quantlabs.net/quantmemberbenefits/slashyourquantlearningcurve/
The membership price *will* be rising as more of the High Frequency Trading (HFT) Algorithm/Strategy Development Course comes online. It’s just too valuable to give away!
NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!