Corrected Markowitz and Sortino views for optimal expected return

(Last Updated On: July 17, 2018)
Learn the Secret

Get  our 2 Free Books

Get these now which land directly to their inbox.
Invalid email address

If you have seen any of my views of Markowitz for portfolio optimization for improved expected return.  You see them here:

Testing of Python Markowitz Portfolio packages

Deep testing of Python Markowitz Portfolio packages

You can always search for more with this

Here are some corrections on both Sortino and Markowitz from some an expert on my Telegram PRIVATE group:

Corrected view

I just wanted to mention a couple of things related to your recent posts.

The first is that Markowitz optimisations assume the returns are normally distributed (which is never the case in finance), so don’t expect to achieve the ‘expected’ return. Also bear in mind that such portfolio optimisation is intended to be done over much longer periods of time; doing it over a week or month is likely an exercise in futility because you’ll constantly be fitting your weights to very recent data which is almost guaranteed to change in the subsequent period due to the nature of financial markets.

In fact, many practioners have come up with improvements to Modern Portfolio Theory (which is certainly not modern these days), and many have also found equally-weighted portfolios to be preferable (e.g. In any case, minimum variance optimizations should be preferred to mean-variance (aka Markowitz); the ‘expected’ return will likely be lower, but it will also be much more realistic than that of the Markowitz portfolio due to the greater out-of-sample persistence of risk-related measures such as variance when compared to those that contain information about absolute returns (e.g. mean of the return distribution).

The second is in relation to the Sortino ratio. You mentioned that the difference between it and the Sharpe is that the Sortino accounts for volatility. This is not the case; the Sortino is identical to the Sharpe except that it does not penalise positive deviation. For me personally, I prefer Sharpe because the objective function that I’m maximising is stability of returns. If you’re more interested in absolute returns, then Sortino is still preferable. But again, measuring over 7 or 30 days is essentially a random exercise.

Combining best performing forex pair should hugely increase your expected return and Sharpe Ratio



NOTE I now post my TRADING ALERTS into my personal FACEBOOK ACCOUNT and TWITTER. Don't worry as I don't post stupid cat videos or what I eat!
This entry was posted in Quant Analytics and tagged , , , , , on by .

About caustic

Hi i there My name is Bryan Downing. I am part of a company called QuantLabs.Net This is specifically a company with a high profile blog about technology, trading, financial, investment, quant, etc. It posts things on how to do job interviews with large companies like Morgan Stanley, Bloomberg, Citibank, and IBM. It also posts different unique tips and tricks on Java, C++, or C programming. It posts about different techniques in learning about Matlab and building models or strategies. There is a lot here if you are into venturing into the financial world like quant or technical analysis. It also discusses the future generation of trading and programming Specialties: C++, Java, C#, Matlab, quant, models, strategies, technical analysis, linux, windows P.S. I have been known to be the worst typist. Do not be offended by it as I like to bang stuff out and put priorty of what I do over typing. Maybe one day I can get a full time copy editor to help out. Do note I prefer videos as they are much easier to produce so check out my many video at